Posted by
blue-line on Monday, September 25, 2006 5:14:20 PM
The CIT (Crisis Intervention Team) program that has been adopted by numerous law
enforcement agencies throughout the nation is not per se Marxist, however I
would say that political correctness and multiculturalism has its roots from
Marxism. They are inherently subsets of
Marxist ideology in which specifically American culture, mores and norms have
been increasingly chipped away in an effort to move toward socialism and
Marxism. Moreover, the values of the
dominant culture have been substituted for the perspectives of victim groups.
In CIT training in
particular you are indoctrinated in victimology of the mentally ill. They want law enforcement to see them as
victims of their illness and not as criminals.
We do on occasions see mentally ill subjects who are not involved in
criminal activity. We have a fundamental
understanding that they ill and are in need of help and don’t know where to
turn. As police officers we can get them
the general help that they need and be on our way to the next call. However, those that do fall under the
criminal category want us to believe that they are victims too. As human beings they need to be held
accountable for there actions regardless of their circumstance. Remember that part of multiculturalism and
political correctness is taking away the true meaning of things and inserting a
new meaning to fit the need. As law
enforcement officials we must not fall prey to this tactic unless we want to
see further erosion of police powers.
Community laws based upon the culture, values and traditions
as well as its history are being replaced by laws and delivery mechanisms that
are universal. As such, these new laws,
human rights laws, trump old values.
Within the context of victims, who really see themselves as a minority,
they appear to have more rights than others based upon victimology.
What we have seen in the past and are seeing more of today
is the rise towards a more multicultural society and that law enforcement
officials of all ranks should undergo training on racial equality and cultural diversity
issues so as to become more non-judgmental about the contacts made during the
working shift. Multiculturalism wants to
promote equal treatment of all cultures, however this is not true. The one culture within our nation that they
don’t treat equally is the indigenous American culture. What one purports to be an agenda of
equality, really promotes the deconstruction of majority culture. What we have seen in the schools as well as
in law enforcement are the teaching that our culture is racist and colonialist
and it should be traded in for a new multicultural model. At the base of multiculturalism, within the
CIT framework is the sense of egalitarianism, which says that everyone’s
culture and lifestyle has equal validity and moral stature.
Italian communist Antonio Gramsci grasped the most effective
means of overturning Western society in which one was to subvert its culture
and morality. Instead of mobilizing the
peasants or working class to take over the world, it would be achieved by the
culture war. The moral beliefs of the
majority would be replaced by the values of those on the margins of
society. This would be brought about by
capturing all of ones community institutions; schools, universities, churches,
the media, the legal community, the police and volunteer groups and making sure
that the elite, intellectual as well, would all be on the same subversive sheet
of music. The consequence of moral and
cultural relativism is that one is increasingly unable to make moral
distinctions based upon behavior. This
moral equivalence reverts into a moral inversion, in which those who do wrong
are excused if they belong to a victim group, while those at the receiving end
of their behavior are blamed because they belong to the majority, which is viewed
as oppressive.
We are increasingly going down this road where the arrestee
is viewed as the victim and the police as the violator; self-defense is viewed
as aggression, while the original violence is viewed sympathetically and with
understanding and in some cases even justified.
We should use current laws and common sense to dictate what is wrong and
what is right in society. For if we
continue with the elevation of the individual and the attack on authority, we
will see an even further fundamental attack on culture, norms and mores,
delving into nihilistic doctrines of postmodernism where everything, including
the concepts of truth and objectivity are reduced to meaninglessness.